What type of argument is exemplified by attacking the character of a person instead of the issue at hand?

The type of argument exemplified by attacking the character of a person rather than addressing the issue at hand is called ad hominem. An ad hominem argument redirects the focus from the argument being made to the individual making that argument, often involving personal attacks or disparagements. This tactic is intended to undermine the credibility of the opponent rather than engaging with the actual concepts or evidence presented in the debate.

In the context of debates or discussions, using ad hominem arguments indicates a failure to address the topics at hand and reflects a strategy aimed at discrediting opponents on a personal level. This can be particularly misleading and manipulative, as it shifts the conversation away from the relevant facts and reasoning. Understanding this helps individuals recognize when discussions are not productive and encourages more rational discourse focused on the issues rather than on personal character.